[Foundation-l] Voting suffrage criteria (established members should be able to vote)

[Jon]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jon wrote:
> Ryan wrote:
>> For your particular case, I wouldn't support an exemption; while I certainly
>> consider you an established community member, it's your fault alone that you
>> scrambled the password and changed the e-mail details of your previous
>> account.  It's like shredding your driver's license in a country or state
>> that requires a driver's license to vote.
> 
>> In general, I think that exceptions should certainly not be made once the
>> election starts.  If any case-based issues should arise, perhaps they could
>> be looked at before the election starts, but I can't think of any scenario
>> where I would support an account being specifically exempted.
> 
> 
> If I read you correctly, you don't agree with my action, so even though
> I can be verified
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Identification_noticeboard
> 
> and my old account will not log in, you thing I should not vote.  Smells
> of retribution?  You argument makes no sense.  Try addressing my
> suggested changes.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jon


Oh my I used the wrong word.  I apologize, retribution was incorrect.

Let me substitute that statement with

"Smells like "I don't agree with your action, completely your fault, and
you knew better, so even though I can verify your story... I don't think
we can help you out.  No voting for you.


This was not a case of retribution and I misspoke.

Best,
Jon


_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIXrZW6+ro8Pm1AtURAuDaAJ0eTNP5Fnn2A0u/MiUTde5zvTXE5ACdHUh0
BImVjwwLsemf9+l0cmSv5Gk=
=bMHK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----