[Foundation-l] Board vote, need a bit of help
Kwan Ting Chan
ktc at ktchan.info
Sat Jun 7 12:27:09 UTC 2008
On Sat, 2008-06-07 at 01:57 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>
> > If
> > the latter, this could happen with the Schulze method as well. People
> > might rank one candidate "1" and leave all the rest blank. There
> > wouldn't be a strategic reason to do this (would there?), but it still
> > might happen.
>
> I'd love to see stats on that. My bet is that a many will rank only a
> few, because of lacking patience, or a belief that they are helping
> their primary choices win like on an approval vote. ::shrugs::
>
> One improvement might be to force people to rank all the candidates
> (not uniquely rank, just rank). I'm sure some would give up voting if
> they couldn't just put a "1" next to their favorite, but would biasing
> the election towards the choices of people who are more patient be all
> that bad? ;)
And what you'll end up with is lots of people putting 2, 2, 2, 2 (or
whatever number), or even worse, random numbering into the rest just so
they could get out of there.
> > I'm interested in whether or not we'll even know if this happened.
> > How much data are we going to be given about the votes?
>
> In the past information on how many were approved was released. I
> don't see why the complete decrypted ballots (which contain no
> personal information) couldn't be released. Especially since we'll
> have ranked data it would be interesting to see how different counting
> systems (IRV, approval of all ranked, approval of all 1s, etc) might
> have influenced the results... and it's pretty normal for the
> anonymous ballots in an election to be not treated as secret.
It will be.
--
Experience is a good school but the fees are high.
- Heinrich Heine
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/attachments/20080607/9a50ef7c/attachment.pgp
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list