[Foundation-l] Copies of Wikipedia's articles found on Knol

Philippe Beaudette philippebeaudette at gmail.com
Mon Jul 28 20:38:04 UTC 2008

Yeah, to be blunt... Nathan, you're in over your head on this one.   
I'd suggest you pull them down until these issues are worked out.

Philippe Beaudette
Tulsa, OK
philippebeaudette at gmail.com

On Jul 28, 2008, at 1:20 PM, effe iets anders wrote:

> All Rights reserved is more restrictive then the GFDL and therefore
> not allowed to relisence with if I am informed correctly. Unless Knol
> allowed GFDL as license option, or CC-BY-SA-3.0 *and* GFDL/CC-BY-SA
> get compatible (not yet the case) you will not be allowed to upload
> Wikipedia content to Knol unless you are the sole author (such as I
> did with Ter Heijde I think)
> Best regards,
> Lodewijk
> 2008/7/28 Nathan <nawrich at gmail.com>:
>> Right, I'm not by any means an expert on the licenses (everytime I  
>> read
>> about them, I look them up again to remind myself what the  
>> differences are)
>> and it did look to me like the issue was one of relicensing.
>> At any rate, they are all licensed appropriately now. Thank you to  
>> whoever
>> made the suggestion of posting the notice and changing the  
>> publication
>> option to "All rights reserved."
>> Nathan
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ 
>> foundation-l
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

More information about the foundation-l mailing list