[Foundation-l] Copies of Wikipedia's articles found on Knol

[Philippe Beaudette]

Yeah, to be blunt... Nathan, you're in over your head on this one.   
I'd suggest you pull them down until these issues are worked out.

_____________________
Philippe Beaudette
Tulsa, OK
philippebeaudette at gmail.com




On Jul 28, 2008, at 1:20 PM, effe iets anders wrote:

> All Rights reserved is more restrictive then the GFDL and therefore
> not allowed to relisence with if I am informed correctly. Unless Knol
> allowed GFDL as license option, or CC-BY-SA-3.0 *and* GFDL/CC-BY-SA
> get compatible (not yet the case) you will not be allowed to upload
> Wikipedia content to Knol unless you are the sole author (such as I
> did with Ter Heijde I think)
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lodewijk
>
> 2008/7/28 Nathan <nawrich at gmail.com>:
>> Right, I'm not by any means an expert on the licenses (everytime I  
>> read
>> about them, I look them up again to remind myself what the  
>> differences are)
>> and it did look to me like the issue was one of relicensing.
>>
>> At any rate, they are all licensed appropriately now. Thank you to  
>> whoever
>> made the suggestion of posting the notice and changing the  
>> publication
>> option to "All rights reserved."
>>
>> Nathan
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ 
>> foundation-l
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l