[Foundation-l] Ethics project on Wikiversity

[geni]

2008/7/13 Christiano Moreschi <moreschiwikiman at hotmail.co.uk>:
>
>> Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 15:30:31 +0100
>> From: geniice at gmail.com
>> To: foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Ethics project on Wikiversity
>>
>> 2008/7/13 Andrew Whitworth <wknight8111 at gmail.com>:
>> > Or, maybe Wikiversity is being used because this is precisely the type
>> > of community-based research and collaboration work that they
>> > specialize in.
>>
>> Oh dear.
>>
>> >Wikiversity isn't censored for the benefit of
>> > Wikipedia,
>>
>> No one suggested it should be.
>>
>> > and their users aren't bound by the content or discussion
>> > policies at Wikipedia or Meta.
>>
>> Again no one suggested that. However it should not allow itself to be
>> used as an attack vector against wikipedia. Well not unless you would
>> consider it legit for the English wikipedia to be used as an attack
>> vector against Wikiversity.
>
> Um, sorry. In the material posted so far, where's the attack?
>
> CM

"The way things stand now, on the English Wikipedia, is that more
often than not, "BLP" stands for "Blasphemies of Living People."
—Moulton 10:27, 11 July 2008 (UTC)"

Given the number of minimalist sporting bios seems unlikely.

-- 
geni