[Foundation-l] Our values

[David Gerard]

On 31/01/2008, Brianna Laugher <brianna.laugher at gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree that NPOV is not good to have as a direct value - it can't
> quite work for all the projects - but even POV material can be
> presented in a neutral way, or flagged as non-neutral, and that is
> good and appropriate I think.


"neutral and appropriate presentation"?

(I personally consider NPOV to be Wikipedia's greatest innovation -
far greater than merely letting everyone edit the content. Has there
ever before been a major encyclopedia with *neutrality* as a core
value?)


- d.