[Foundation-l] Transparency

[Nathan]

That is what I thought, actually. Even so, still probably not
appropriate for a public Wikimedia list.

Nathan

On Jan 9, 2008 6:34 PM, Austin Hair <adhair at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2008 4:28 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Greg is telling "foundation" people that they need to
> > > be transparent with "wiki" people no matter how
> > > expensive because "wiki" is the means of the
> > > "foundation".  Erik replies that his first method of
> > > promoting transparency to these people is to promote
> > > more of them to volunteer in these issues rather than
> > > just comment. Meanwhile, in the ru.WB thread,  a
> > > "wiki" person explains why he finds "foundation"
> > > people to be pesky salesman that would do better to
> > > spend their time on wiki work.
> >
> > I wouldn't read too much into the ravings of a rogue admin - I don't
> > think his views are particularly representative of any significant
> > portion of the community.
>
> This kind of talk isn't at all appropriate.  Please keep a civil
> tongue when discussing issues on any Wikimedia mailing list.
>
> Austin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>