[Foundation-l] Meta-arbcom (was: the foundations of...)

[Gerard Meijssen]

Hoi,
One is not really a good thing to do. Projects have to find their own way.
Two is not really a good thing to do. Projects are independent and it is not
for the German, the English Wikipedia to determine what the Frisian
Wikipedia is to do. "Issues with projects as a whole" sounds to be rather
nebulous. What kind of issues would they be and under what circumstances
would it make sense for an outside body to get involved ?
Thanks,
     GerardM

On Jan 5, 2008 8:17 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok. Functions for a meta-arbcom. So far, I can see three general ideas
> for the kinds of cases they could consider:
>
> 1) The same kind of cases local arbcoms consider, but on projects
> which are too small to have an arbcom.
> 2) The same kind of cases local arbcoms consider, but when they affect
> multiple projects.
> 3) Issues with projects as a whole.
>
> I suggest we try and complete this list, and then we can move on to
> discussing which items on the list should and should not be part of
> meta-arbcom's remit.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>