[Foundation-l] Meta-arbcom (was: the foundations of...)

hillgentleman hillgentleman.wikiversity at gmail.com
Sat Jan 5 16:11:17 UTC 2008


Thomas Dalton,

 And the comments of the arbitrators should, of course, be translated to
the native language of the project, unless it is clear that there is
no such need.

Best,
H.
On 05/01/2008, hillgentleman <hillgentleman.wikiversity at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thomas Dalton,
>
> > The arguments from the parties, yes. I'm talking about discussion
> > within the committee. Once they've heard the arguments they need to
> > deliberate and reach a conclusion - that deliberation needs to happen
> > in one language or it's simply impractical.
>
>   Then I might have misread your comment.  Yes, that would be useful.
> That is up to the arbitrators and it is not something that we should bother
> ourselves with.
>
> Best,
> H.
>



More information about the foundation-l mailing list