[Foundation-l] Next board meeting
thomas.dalton at gmail.com
Sun Feb 24 14:40:02 UTC 2008
On 24/02/2008, Ilario Valdelli <valdelli at gmail.com> wrote:
> No problem but in any case the name of Financial Controller is more
> correct than "treasurer".
Not really, the position is traditionally called "treasurer". I've
never heard of a "Financial Controller".
> As you see here
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treasurer#In_other_organizations probably
> that are skills that cannot be managed by volunteers.
Which is why the board are struggling to find someone. Give them time,
I'm sure they'll find someone suitable eventually.
> It seems more realistic to bound the role for control.
I don't understand. What parts of the standard role of a treasurer do
you think should be excluded?
More information about the foundation-l