[Foundation-l] misleading advice on oversight on wikizine

Pedro Sanchez pdsanchez at gmail.com
Tue Feb 19 14:10:34 UTC 2008

On Feb 19, 2008 4:37 AM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
> I disagree. There is an increased need for oversight (it's marginal,
> though). Before, when one of the 3 situations you quote came up we had
> a choice between oversight and simple deletion. Simple deletion was
> find in the less sensitive cases. Now, for large pages, that option is
> gone, so oversight will need to be used in every case, that results in
> a greater need for oversight.

Then the Foundation will need to review its policy to determine if
oversight is appropiate for removing un-sensitive information from
those pages. Because it has always been emphasized oversight should
not be used unless there's an important reason to do it, and htat's
why 2 out of the 3 cases require Foundation's advice in order to carry

More information about the foundation-l mailing list