[Foundation-l] and what if...

[Thomas Dalton]

> The IWF said that contextual issues are important in the decision of whether
> or not they will keep the webpage on their list.  They specifically
> reiterated that they still consider the image to be potentially illegal.

You expected them to actually admit to having made a mistake? Why
would they do that? There would be nothing to gain by it and they
would just lose face.