[Foundation-l] Note regarding status of privacy policy
Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijssen at gmail.com
Sun Aug 10 06:39:15 UTC 2008
Hoi,
It has been said and confirmed, that people who have the bits to check user
on a project, are beholden to the rules of that community. There is no
formal or other connection to the foundation or the organisation. It is
really nice that you consider this fact fud but that does not make it so.
Please read back on this thread to find the relevant bits.
Thanks,
GerardM
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonavaro at gmail.com
> wrote:
> private musings wrote:
> > hmmm.... can't quite agree with you, Jussi.
> >
> > I share some of Slim's concerns on this one, though I write more as a
> > reprobate whose multiple accounts were detected late last year - also the
> > comparison with the animal rights movement's attempts to decentralise
> made
> > sense to me - it seemed like an apt analogy.
> >
> Well, it just isn't.
>
> I find it quite laughable that anyone would assume that
> a checkuser would be somehow "free as a bird" to do what
> they wish in terms of their technical widgets, with no
> connexion to the foundation at all. Even suggesting that
> is tantamount to FUD in the third degree to my mind.
>
> > Does it really matter if people are checkusered regularly, with a
> liberally
> > low bar, and the information garnered from such checks is shared between
> > friends and colleagues equally liberally?
> >
> > Maybe, maybe not - but I think that's kinda the status quo, and I think
> > people deserve the right to question it without being poo pooed -
> especially
> > when it's not really reflected by what's written on the tin at the policy
> > pages.
> >
> > On the other hand - I see this thread's purpose was intended to be a
> review
> > of the new draft of the privacy policy. I think it's an improvement - I
> > think the key issues relate to the ways it's implemented - I would like
> to
> > assume for example that some rigour is applied to the assessment of
> external
> > legal claims before IP data is handed over.
> >
> > best,
> >
> > Peter
> > PM.
> >
>
>
> Yours,
>
> Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list