[Foundation-l] Board restructuring and community

Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen at gmail.com
Wed Apr 30 11:46:00 UTC 2008

Let us be practical. There are two ways of doing this; either you insist on
a measurement for the number of commits - this has to be developed and as it
is for a REALLY small group of people it is expensive or you create a group
and call it something like SVN committer and all committers can vote. This
too takes some work but seems to me to be much less expensive.

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Milos Rancic <millosh at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:23 PM, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> >  Hmmmm. What do you think would be a suitable criterion to allow votes
> >  from our (ridiculously valuable) technical volunteers? Good devs and
> >  volunteer sysadmins (a phrase I'd never thought would be a reality
> >  before I saw it happening on Wikimedia) are much rarer than good
> >  content contributors.
> Even it is not a question to me: A number of Subversion commits. They
> varies like articles -- from minor edits to major ones. And there is a
> list which gathers all of those informations (one with the biggest
> archive).
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

More information about the foundation-l mailing list