[Foundation-l] Board restructuring and community

Ilario Valdelli valdelli at gmail.com
Tue Apr 29 11:43:03 UTC 2008

I think that the reaction of chapters will follow... they are thinking
and discussing what it's the sense of this decision.

Personally I think that 4 experts is a big number for the board.
Experts are consultants not board members!!!

Probably 2 experts is a number sufficient to cover particular skills
but the board it's the *unique* link between the communities and the
management, IMHO this new configuration it's a suicide of the board.

Surely the 2 chapters members in the board must replace the experts
seats and not the community's seats.


On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Florence Devouard <Anthere9 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>  What astonishes me is the lack of reaction on the part of chapters.
>  I fully expected a backslash from the community, though I thought it
>  would be on a different substance somehow.
>  However, I expected the chapter members to react, if only to share
>  interjections such as "how are we going to decide on the representants
>  ???". The only reaction I saw was the very negative feedback from
>  Lodewijk. I am *genuinely and honestly" puzzled by the near absence of
>  reaction. I do not know what to think of it.

More information about the foundation-l mailing list