[Foundation-l] Board-announcement: Board Restructuring
Bryan Tong Minh
bryan.tongminh at gmail.com
Sun Apr 27 18:16:50 UTC 2008
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Tim Landscheidt <tim at tim-landscheidt.de> wrote:
> "Brianna Laugher" <brianna.laugher at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > [...]
>
> > (Ironic...
> > We are happy to let the content in the world's top reference source be
> > decided by anyone who puts their hand up, but not the governance nub
> > of same.
> > When do we under- and when do we over-estimate our own power?)
>
> > With the recent professionalisation of WMF - massively expanded staff,
> > and the end of the "working Board", is this fear still well-founded?
> > (if it ever was)
> > [...]
>
> IBTD. A lot of users will happily create articles, revert
> vandalism and ensure NPOV on their turf but won't be inter-
> ested to follow foundation "politics" and so will either not
> participate in elections or maybe cast their vote for the
> most populist candidate.
>
> What I find most interesting about the whole quest for
> councils and board seats (vulgo: power) is that there is no
> incentive to those positions: The funds are earmarked (and
> rather small) and as soon as you make a decision that is
> contrary to the community's consensus, they will walk and
> you will have to cover yourself whether Amy Winehouse is so-
> ber or stoned at the moment. Or, in other words: There is no
> power because you cannot give orders to volunteers.
>
> Personally, I would not mind if the current board's terms
> end 2099 as long as the servers are running, MediaWiki is
> maintained and developed and the financial conduct does not
> cross any legal limits.
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
I fully agree.
Bryan
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list