[Foundation-l] Board response on Volunteer Council

effe iets anders effeietsanders at gmail.com
Sat Apr 26 05:41:20 UTC 2008


I am seriously disappointed for the Board not to take this chance and
finally catalyze the community process here. It was a great
opportunity in my opinion, and I am sorry you are making things so
hard now. It does not happen that often that such a lot of people at
least agree on a concept, which makes it even more sad with such a lot
volunteer representatives on the board that you were unanle to fit
things in. I think I'll let things sink in first, and respond later on
more in-depth.

-- Lodewijk

2008/4/26 Michael Snow <wikipedia op verizon.net>:
> Michael Snow wrote:
>  > At this stage, the board has decided not to take action on the proposal
>  > to develop a Volunteer Council. We thank everyone who put the time and
>  > effort into formulating and discussing this proposal. Although the board
>  > did not find a clear fit for this proposal in the formal structure of
>  > the Wikimedia Foundation, we didn't rule out the possibility that the
>  > Wikimedia project communities might organize this or another type of
>  > council for their own benefit.
>  >
>  Not speaking on behalf of the board generally, I'll share some of my
>  personal opinion here. I can see some potential benefit to a volunteer
>  council or similar body, but more clearly in a function of
>  self-government for the community, where this may be lacking. That is to
>  say, not so much to be involved in foundation-level operations, but to
>  allow the foundation to avoid interfering where it is not wanted and
>  does not want to be.
>
>  For example, I don't think we as the board should really be approving
>  stewards, or new arbitration committees on projects. Those are affairs
>  for the community to handle on its own, other than that the foundation
>  may want to have those people be personally identifiable. I could
>  imagine that starting projects in new languages (as opposed to launching
>  entirely new projects) might fit under this heading as well. So I
>  encourage people to keep looking at the idea, and I would support
>  developments that allow the community to govern itself instead of
>  lapsing into anarchy.
>
>
>
>  --Michael Snow
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  foundation-l mailing list
>  foundation-l op lists.wikimedia.org
>  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>



More information about the foundation-l mailing list