[Foundation-l] UNIQUE AND WORKABLE CRITERION
Mark Williamson
node.ue at gmail.com
Fri Apr 18 05:39:34 UTC 2008
I don't think we want low quality things that are merely
"understandable". When possible, we should demand native speakers.
When that is not possible, we should demand people with a professional
level of fluency.
Mark
On 17/04/2008, Crazy Lover <always_yours.forever at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com>
> To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 10:39:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] UNIQUE AND WORKABLE CRITERION
>
> > * what kind of languages can have wikis?
> >
> > any that has a standarized writing system and enough writers and
> > readers to form a viable community and audience. whether a particular
> > language qualifies depends on discussion.
>
>
> While the basic idea is about right, I think we need to be more
> precise. If we adopt your criterion, we're going to get disputes over
> the definitions of "writer", "reader" and "viable". Do writers and
> readers need to be native speakers, fluent or just have a basic
> understanding of the language, for example?
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>
> native speakers, it is no longer mandatory. then they can be natural, artificial or classics.
>
> writer: someone that is able to write the language acceptably?, well?, fluent? that another person understand that he/she has written.(understandable).
>
> reader: someone that is able to understand the language that is reading.
>
> viable: i'm not thinking in numbers. that allows it to function without problems.???
>
>
> this is not a exact science. accordingly we need to accept some flexibility..
>
>
>
> C.L.
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
>
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list