[Foundation-l] Projects without >FDL1.2 migration clause

[Dan Rosenthal]

Except when it's a volunteer council. Then we're perfectly ok with not  
thinking, and ready to ignore the possibility of really bad  
consequences. I mean, who needs things like carefulness and legitimate  
open discussion anyway? When the criticism gets tough, we can just  
ignore it and move to read-only lists and private wikis.

-Dan
On Apr 9, 2008, at 3:32 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:

> On 4/7/08, Jimmy Wales <jwales at wikia.com> wrote:
>> Milos Rancic wrote:
>>> There are a couple of more really bad possibilities in that way,  
>>> which
>>> raises the question: Does anyone really think about the possibility
>>> for really bad consequences?
>>
>> Yes, I think a lot of people spend a lot of time thinking about the
>> possibility of really bad consequences.  That's why we are doing  
>> things
>> so carefully and with full open discussion of the right way forward.
>>
>> --Jimbo
>>
>>
>
> I think this is quite right as a case of securing our butts, but even
> if we can't trust the law to be our friend, let's not lose sight of  
> the
> fact that suing wikipedia would be very close to (to use a Budweiser
> analogy) suing cute puppy dogs.
>
> Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l