[Foundation-l] An argument for strong copyleft
wikimail at inbox.org
Mon Apr 7 20:14:56 UTC 2008
> > For those Bill's who don't mind Carrie's using their work in this way,
> > there's always CC-BY or some other non-copylefted free license.
> I want to protect the "freeness" of actual derivatives of my work,
> which is why I dislike CC-BY. What I don't want is a purity test for
> something that I and most people would not consider a derivative work,
> but merely using two works on the same page.
Most people have no clue what the term "derivative work" means, but I
would assume that most people who do have a clue would agree that a
newspaper article which contains both photos and text is a derivative
work of both the photos and the text.
The FSF has confused this point by trying to claim that in some
instances the text is a derivative work of the photos. That part's
generally nonsense. But the *combined* work is pretty clearly a
derivative work. Of course, there's very little case law on this,
because it almost never matters.
More information about the foundation-l