[Foundation-l] Projects without >FDL1.2 migration clause

[Erik Moeller]

On 4/7/08, Milos Rancic <millosh at gmail.com> wrote:
>  But (again...), I am really surprised that I informed Erik about
>  something which is at least two years old. Members of the team which
>  is negotiating shouldn't rely on informations which *someone* didn't
>  forget.

You made the claim that there are projects that are using "_strictly_
GFDL 1.2". So far you haven't produced evidence that there are any -
the only case of ambiguity cited in this thread has been addressed.
So, are there any? I'm aware of some media with a GFDL 1.2 only
clause, but not of any projects.
-- 
Erik Möller
Deputy Director, Wikimedia Foundation

Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate