[Foundation-l] Projects without >FDL1.2 migration clause

Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton at gmail.com
Mon Apr 7 15:48:11 UTC 2008

>  If this is true, we could probably use the "protest if you object"
>  process proposed by Mike a while ago for these projects. It would be
>  painful if there's a substantial number of users who object to a
>  license change, but may become necessary.

While Mike's the lawyer, not me, it still seems very strange that you
can violate someone's copyright just by asking nicely and them not
responding within a given time frame. Even if that is the case in the
US, it would seem sensible to check with someone with a more
international expertise that it works elsewhere.

More information about the foundation-l mailing list