[Foundation-l] Creative Commons CC-BY-SA Draft Statement of Intent

Milos Rancic millosh at gmail.com
Sun Apr 6 10:52:14 UTC 2008


The whole process was far from transparent and you are continuing with
writing rationalizations for keeping the process nontransparent.
Changing the license is not only a matter of the Board, but it is a
matter of all contributors.

I don't remember that I've seen any professional analysis of what we
are getting and what we are losing by switching from one to another
license. There were only amateur arguing (including your, Erik's,
mine, Gregory's, Gerard's...) pro and contra one or another license.
(If there was such analysis, please, give me a link.)

On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Jimmy Wales <jwales at wikia.com> wrote:
> Milos Rancic wrote:
>  > May you inform us about at least some of your conclusions (I am
>  > particularly interested in Mike's conclusions, of course)? Also, while
>  > I am not perfectly informed about this, I really wouldn't miss the
>  > information which you said now. So, please, may this process be a
>  > little bit more transparent?
>
>  I am not sure what I can tell you.  What do you want to know?
>
>  It is not possible to tell you blow by blow the state of complex
>  discussions.  It's the hands of lawyers who are working very
>  thoughtfully about how to deal with complex issues.  Discussions have
>  been going on for years, and things are very close to resolution.
>
>  There was a public comment process, did you take part in it?
>
>  --Jimbo
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  foundation-l mailing list
>  foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>



More information about the foundation-l mailing list