[Foundation-l] Provisional Volunteer Council - proposal sent to the Board

Florence Devouard Anthere9 at yahoo.com
Thu Apr 3 07:40:12 UTC 2008

Birgitte SB wrote:
> --- Milos Rancic <millosh at gmail.com> wrote:
>> VC should, also, take care about all things which
>> are related to the
>> community. This means that admins, bureaucrats,
>> stewards etc. should
>> be responsible to VC, not to the Board.
> Admins and bureaucrats should be responsible to
> community consensus within each project.  Perhaps
> certain community policies (i.e. EDP) might be
> required to be approved by the VC.  The community as a
> whole might be tasked to find a consensus within X
> boundary set by the VC or fork.  But individuals in
> these trusted community positions are not now
> responsible to the board nor should they be
> responsible to the VC.
> Birgitte SB

I presume he is conceiving the VC as a super arbcom.
That's not what I think the VC should be about, but many people do see 
arbcom as role of VC, and I respect that.


More information about the foundation-l mailing list