[Foundation-l] [Fwd: Sardininan - Sassarese languages or language and dialect?]

[Mark Williamson]

You just remarked that "The Limba Sarda Comune is
a newly created language that is made up of two Sardinian languages".

It is not just legally, but in the minds of almost every speaker of
Logudorese and Campidanese that they are one language. If you ask them
what language they speak, they will not tell you "Eo faeddo su
logudoresu" or "Eo fueddhu su campidanesu", they will say they speak
"sardu". If you ask them what language the other speaks, the answer
will be the same.

Mark

On 11/09/2007, GerardM <gerard.meijssen at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hoi,
> I am glad to hear it. It is however beside the point.
> Thanks,
>     GerardM
>
> On 9/11/07, Mark Williamson <node.ue at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > ...having said that, Campidanese and Logudorese are both easily
> > intelligible to LSC, that is its intent. Anybody who speaks
> > Campidanese or Logudorese should easily and rapidly understand any
> > text written in it. Campidanese and Logudorese are not _that_
> > different.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > On 11/09/2007, Mark Williamson <node.ue at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 11/09/2007, Andre Engels <andreengels at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > 2007/9/11, Sabine Cretella <sabine_cretella at yahoo.it>:
> > > > dialects, which are not). The question should be whether the 4
> > > > languages and the newly created official version are close enough to
> > > > be considered dialects of a single language. If that is the case, then
> > > > there's only one official form of the language, and using that is not
> > > > a strange thing to do.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, the language committee refuses to do that because it
> > > would be "unfair", despite the fact that linguists can and have done
> > > studies in intelligibility for certain varieties (although, I am
> > > guessing, not those of Sardinia).
> > >
> > > Instead, they choose to believe that anything assigned its own ISO
> > > code must automatically be a separate language, and anything that does
> > > not have one must be invalid and need to be deleted right away because
> > > it is just a mutually intelligible dialect or a non-existant language
> > > squatting a code that belongs to somebody else.
> > >
> > > Standards compliance is a good thing, but there is a certain point at
> > > which the enforcers of the standards become rabid and they have gone
> > > too far.
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > > --
> > > Refije dirije lanmè yo paske nou posede pwòp bato.
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Refije dirije lanmè yo paske nou posede pwòp bato.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>


-- 
Refije dirije lanmè yo paske nou posede pwòp bato.