[Foundation-l] Let's switch to CC-BY-SA

[geni]

On 10/09/2007, Anthony <wikimail at inbox.org> wrote:
> On 9/9/07, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 10/09/2007, Anthony <wikimail at inbox.org> wrote:
> > > Agreed, but not applicable, as what would be ethical would be to start
> > > following the GFDL.
> > >
> > > Of course, from a legal standpoint, that'd be irrelevant, since the
> > > WMF has already had its rights terminated under the GFDL (see section
> > > 9).
> >
> > WMF is not a publisher so it's rights are irrelevant.
>
> True, I suppose, in which case every single person who has ever edited
> a Wikipedia article has had their rights terminated under section 9.
>
> > Wikipedia
> > documents are within the GFDL as long as you consider the entire
> > document (the article text, the history and various other bits) rather
> > than a single page.
>
> Perhaps you could point me to the title page which lists the five
> principal authors of the Document, then.

Strangely the GFDL does not state the the title page and history page
cannot be the same thing.

-- 
geni