[Foundation-l] Priorities

[Ray Saintonge]

teun spaans wrote:
> Perhaps we should upgrade "bilingual" to "multilingual"?
>   
I don't really object to that, though I'd have to check whether this is 
allowed for official by-laws.  Nevertheless, if it's difficult enough to 
get things done in one language multiplying the number of languages 
won't make things any easier.

Ec
>> Thanks, and thanks also for the translations that you did of my by-law
>> efforts.  Legalese can't be the easiest thing to translate.
>>
>> In the short term I would go with only the English by-laws as official.
>> In the longer term bilingual rules are preferable, but that can wait
>> until we have real people who will be affected by them to vote on them.
>>