[Foundation-l] Unofficial stable version demo

[David Goodman]

there is still the problem of the word "vandalism" I agree that it
sets up exactly the wrong expectations.

On 10/4/07, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/4/07, David Goodman <dgoodmanny at gmail.com> wrote:
> > reviewed or examined or checked would seem to be the English idiom,
> > in any case, not sighted, But given the degree of scrutiny, I suppose
> > we want something much much weaker.
>
> You could call it what it is: "unreviewed" and "reviewed for
> vandalism". But there doesn't seem to be anything which is terse,
> precise, and understandable to the layman.
>
> I prefer a distinction like "published" and "draft": it's terse and
> instantly understandable but not very precise.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>


-- 
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.