[Foundation-l] Lingoz vs Wiktionary

[David Gerard]

On 03/10/2007, GerardM <gerard.meijssen at gmail.com> wrote:

> The title of the article is presumptuous, as I said it is not a wiki, you
> can add definitions, but you cannot change the other information. This is
> not necessarily bad but not being able to edit what is there ... I would say
> that Wiktionary is better at that. So I compared "presumptuous", and I like
> it that OmegaWiki shows the data in my native language. Wiktionary covers
> more meanings and well, if lingoz is Wiktionary done right, I do not know
> what went wrong.


I'm more surprised and pleased that Wiktionary has achieved sufficient
prominence that someone thinks competing against it is a business
model :-)


- d.