[Foundation-l] Interesting non-profit ranking

Milos Rancic millosh at gmail.com
Wed Oct 3 18:39:22 UTC 2007


On 10/3/07, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com> wrote:
> Not really: If they are counting inline images you should expect
> wikimedia.org to get almost the same score as Wikipedia.  If they are
> not counting inline images then wikimedia's traffic level shouldn't be
> enough to get it on a top-sites list.

At the list wikipedia.org is rated 40, wikimedia.org is 3.xx and the
third site is something like 3.xx - 0.03.

So, it is reasonable to suppose that wikimedia.org is really at the
second place (and without upload).



More information about the foundation-l mailing list