[Foundation-l] GFDL and relicensing

Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton at gmail.com
Sun Nov 25 20:45:04 UTC 2007

> But...it's a strawman.  A better response would be "No I didn't
> license it under GFDL 1.2 Or Later; furthermore, even if I did, I
> retract it."

But that would be simply untrue, on both counts. It clearly was
licensed under GFDL 1.2 or later (unless "or later" clauses are found
to be completely invalid, regardless of spirit, but that's a separate
issue), since that's what it says right above the "Submit" button, and
there are no legal means (to my knowledge) of retracting the GFDL.

More information about the foundation-l mailing list