[Foundation-l] GFDL and relicensing

[George Herbert]

On Nov 21, 2007 5:59 PM, Robert Horning <robert_horning at netzero.net> wrote:

> BTW, you can count me in an a GFDL ideologist if you want, and my
> contributions are under the terms of the GFDL.... and I intend to
> enforce that license on anything I've contributed to Wikimedia projects
> where the GFDL is the explicit default license of the project.
>

If the next generation of GFDL were something along the lines of
CC-BY-SA-2.5, would that be an acceptable future evolution from your
perspective?