[Foundation-l] Do we need a Code of Participation?

Rob Smith nobs03 at gmail.com
Thu Nov 15 06:05:29 UTC 2007


Oh, well thanks.  All one needs to do is "edit this page" on libel, and it
can be improved.

On 11/14/07, Dan Rosenthal <swatjester at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Nevermind, I'm not going to argue this point any further, a) because
> I don't care, and b) I'm referring to an immaterial point to your
> complaint,  which is that you should have said libel.
>
> -Dan
> On Nov 15, 2007, at 12:44 AM, Rob Smith wrote:
>
> > Well, that's a bad standard to set.  Because obviously that stands
> > in marked
> > contrast to all your stated policies, be they NPA & Civility, Dispute
> > Resolution "in good faith," or even you own citation policies.
> >
> > On 11/14/07, Dan Rosenthal <swatjester at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> You apparently missed the point of my statement by a wide margin
> >> which was that they don't exist at all due to the medium.
> >>
> >> -Dan
> >> On Nov 15, 2007, at 12:31 AM, Rob Smith wrote:
> >>
> >>> You're right, they are embalmed in an ArbCom decision, of which the
> >>> presiding Arbitrator admits to errors, and has sought to remove.
> >>>
> >>> On 11/14/07, Dan Rosenthal <swatjester at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> 'Slanders don't occur at all....
> >>>>
> >>>> -Dan
> >>>> On Nov 14, 2007, at 9:53 PM, Rob Smith wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 11/14/07, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 15/11/2007, Rob Smith <nobs03 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> When Am I gonna see action on my case?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Never?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - d.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Slanders don't have to be in mainspace in articles of notable
> >>>>> people, they
> >>>>> can occur in your Dispute Resolution processes against common
> >>>>> editors.
> >>>>> Ultimately, it is your name and reputation that must defended,
> >>>>> knowing the
> >>>>> facts, and allowing your policies and processes to be used to that
> >>>>> way.
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> foundation-l mailing list
> >>>>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> >>>>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/
> >>>>> foundation-l
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> foundation-l mailing list
> >>>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> >>>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/
> >>>> foundation-l
> >>>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> foundation-l mailing list
> >>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> >>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/
> >>> foundation-l
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> foundation-l mailing list
> >> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> >> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>


More information about the foundation-l mailing list