[Foundation-l] Do we need a Code of Participation?

[Dan Rosenthal]

You apparently missed the point of my statement by a wide margin  
which was that they don't exist at all due to the medium.

-Dan
On Nov 15, 2007, at 12:31 AM, Rob Smith wrote:

> You're right, they are embalmed in an ArbCom decision, of which the
> presiding Arbitrator admits to errors, and has sought to remove.
>
> On 11/14/07, Dan Rosenthal <swatjester at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> 'Slanders don't occur at all....
>>
>> -Dan
>> On Nov 14, 2007, at 9:53 PM, Rob Smith wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/14/07, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 15/11/2007, Rob Smith <nobs03 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> When Am I gonna see action on my case?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Never?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> - d.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Slanders don't have to be in mainspace in articles of notable
>>> people, they
>>> can occur in your Dispute Resolution processes against common  
>>> editors.
>>> Ultimately, it is your name and reputation that must defended,
>>> knowing the
>>> facts, and allowing your policies and processes to be used to that
>>> way.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> foundation-l mailing list
>>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ 
>>> foundation-l
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l