[Foundation-l] Steward elections

Dan Rosenthal swatjester at gmail.com
Mon Nov 12 23:29:53 UTC 2007

I think that the argument was in reference to the developers, and  
obviously not referring to Jimbo.

-Dan Rosenthal
On Nov 12, 2007, at 6:15 PM, geni wrote:

> On 12/11/2007, effe iets anders <effeietsanders at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2007/11/12, geni <geniice at gmail.com>:
>>>> and they would need the tools from
>>>> time to time and not always and its wiser to let them keep it  
>>>> and they
>>>> may not use it rather then to take it away from them and they  
>>>> wont be
>>>> able to use it when and if they need it... (O_o)
>>> Everyone you listed there except Jimbo is a developer. Taking  
>>> steward
>>> away from them would have zero practical impact because they can do
>>> exactly the same things and more through direct database edits
>>> including making themselves stewards again.
>> <snip>
>> which is exactly why we want them to stay stewards. Because  
>> developers
>> actions are not publicly logged, and stewards actions are.
>> BR, Eia
> Jimbo however is not a developer so whichever way you look at it the
> argument doesn't hold.
> -- 
> geni
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

More information about the foundation-l mailing list