[Foundation-l] [Announcement] French lawsuit against WMF won in court

[Pierre Beaudouin]

and probably Lafesse vs. Myspace

http://www.juriscom.net/actu/visu.php?ID=942


2007/11/4, Christophe Henner <christophe.henner at gmail.com>:
> They're speaking of the case of Dailymotion. They lost in July (the
> 17th iirc). It was slightly different, it wasn't about defamation but
> author's right.
>
> In the final statement, the judge as soon as an host is aware of an
> illegal content on one of his website, he becomes responsible.
>
> On 03/11/2007, Florence Devouard <Anthere9 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Ray Saintonge wrote:
> > > Michael Bimmler wrote:
> > >> On 11/2/07, Platonides <Platonides at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> OT: What's the meaning of CA on the favicon?
> > >>>
> > >> Conseil d'administration [=board] maybe? Might be that the favicon has
> > >> been taken from a WmFR-Board wiki or something. Just guessing...
> > >>
> > >>> http://www.lemonde.fr/web/depeches/0,14-0,39-33068926@7-50,0.html
> > >>> Article in Le Monde (in french)
> > >>>
> > > I note the last paragraph of the article:
> > >
> > >     Si cette décision est encourageante pour les hébergeurs, elle ne
> > >     constitue en rien une jurisprudence. D'autant que ces derniers mois,
> > >     d'autres tribunaux ont rendu des décisions qui allaient en sens
> > >     inverse en reconnaissant la responsabilité éditoriale des hébergeurs.
> > >
> > > How are these other cases distinguished from our case?
> > >
> > > Ec
> >
> > It would actually be helpful if they cited their sources. Problem is we
> > have no idea which cases they refer to :-(
> >
> > ant
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
>
>
> --
> schiste