[Foundation-l] 09-f9-...

[Ray Saintonge]

geni wrote:

>On 5/9/07, Todd Allen <toddmallen at gmail.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>The fact that the number itself is a big part of the issue here (as
>>evidenced by this conversation, after all?) So, why should we -not-
>>print it? It's evident AACS doesn't intend to cause legal trouble,
>>they'd make themselves a laughingstock.
>>    
>>
>
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6623331.stm
>
>We have no frigging idea which way the MPAA is going to jump. 
>
Putting a precipice in front of them could help them in that decision. :-)

Ec