[Foundation-l] 09-f9-...

Yonatan Horan yonatanh at gmail.com
Wed May 9 17:40:24 UTC 2007

I have a simple question. What's the harm in waiting a period of a month, in
which we will not allow the addition of these numbers to articles. In a
month we'll all be much wiser and will therefore be able to make a better
informed decision. There's hardly any harm in an article of ours not having
some number in it [related as it may be] for a month.


On 5/9/07, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09/05/07, Stephen Bain <stephen.bain at gmail.com> wrote:
> > It may have significance in a tactical sense, but please do not
> > represent it as if it has legal significance.
> Around this issue, it's *all* tactical significance. Or everyone
> posting the number would have received a takedown notice. As we have
> not.
> - d.
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

More information about the foundation-l mailing list