[Foundation-l] Rethinking Brands
wknight8111 at hotmail.com
Tue May 8 01:20:28 UTC 2007
>There is an alternative brand strategy: making use of the strongest
>brand (Wikipedia) to identify all activities of the Foundation.
As a wikibookian almost exclusively, i have some issues with this idea.
* Wikipedia is like the domineering older sister, and other WMF projects
have been trying long and hard to differentiate themselves from wikipedia. I
know at en.wikibooks we've spent considerable time explaining why we are not
wikipedia, and how it is that we differ from that project. Naming us
"wikipedia books" would simply blur the lines even further, and stamp out
our attempts at forming an independent, successful project. Wikibooks is
still small but it is growing steadily, and we hope (perhaps naively) that
we will be big and important some day just like wikipedia is now. Renaming
us to "Wikipedia books" is akin to saying "you will never be as important as
* Along the lines of the above, many projects have very different policy
then wikipedia does. Naming all the sites "wikipedia" will raise confusion
because every project handles things differently. Users will be needlessly
confused by us saying "no, you can do that on the other wikipedia, but you
can't do that on this wikipedia", etc.
* Saying "Wikibooks is a sister project of Wikipedia" is far less confusing
then saying that "Wikipedia books is not quite the same as the regular
wikipedia, even though we have the same name."
* What would be the new URL? would it be something convoluted like
en.books.wikipedia.org? There are alot of links that would need to be
updated, on-wiki and elsewhere if our URL was changed.
* The WMF has some history of loving Wikipedia and ignoring the other
projects. For example, what percentage of WMF board members have an account
at en.wikibooks? any language wikibooks? Other then giving up on other
projects and focusing on wikipedia, you should be encouraging other projects
to grow independently. changing our name, while you may call it "rebranding"
seems alot to me like squashing our identity and our potential as an
independent WMF project.
* Since an encyclopedia and a dictionary are "books", it would really be
less confusing to rename wikipedia and wiktionary to "Encyclopedia Wikibook"
and "Dictionary Wikibook", respectively. Alternatively, since all of the
books at wikibooks are not encyclopedia's, it makes no sense to brand them
with the 'pedia suffix :)
Get a FREE Web site, company branded e-mail and more from Microsoft Office
More information about the foundation-l