[Foundation-l] WMF resolution on access to non-public data passed

[Stephen Bain]

On 5/2/07, phoebe ayers <phoebe.wiki at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The resolution seems like it is  filling in the
> gap of also getting a positive ID for people, so that as Kat says the
> Foundation can "ensure that volunteers can be held accountable for their own
> actions." It would be nice to clarify though if this in the only purpose or
> if there is a larger assumption being made about what these positive IDs
> will achieve.

That's basically it, as I understand it. It's about ensuring that
volunteers in these positions are legally competent in their
jurisdiction.

-- 
Stephen Bain
stephen.bain at gmail.com