[Foundation-l] check user...
meta.sj at gmail.com
Sat Mar 31 17:08:04 UTC 2007
<checks the name of the mailing list>
Most wikipedias don't have an ArbCom[m].
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Pedro Sanchez wrote:
> On 3/31/07, Samuel Klein <meta.sj at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Sebastian Moleski wrote:
>>> It might be prudent to use the term "jurisdiction" instead of country if
>>> we're talking semantic details here. Shouldn't this discussion take place on
>>> a talk page somewhere?
>> Weak agreement on this invocation of the Fear Of Law. Strong agreement
>> that this discussion should be on a wiki page; see
> Actually, as it's pointed in several places, that discussion is the
> sole purview of the ArbCom (as long as they don't contradict the
> global checkuser policy), not to the community.
>> I am generally loathe to use age as a barrier for anything; we should be
>> clear about where this line is being drawn, and for what reasons.
>> "This is a very important role" is not a reason to discriminate based on
>> age. "This is a role that requires being responsible" is likewise not
>> appropriate. "This is a role that requires being legally accountable for
>> one's actions" is...
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
More information about the foundation-l