[Foundation-l] check user...

[Samuel Klein]

<checks the name of the mailing list>

Most wikipedias don't have an ArbCom[m].

SJ


On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Pedro Sanchez wrote:

> On 3/31/07, Samuel Klein <meta.sj at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Sebastian Moleski wrote:
>>
>>> It might be prudent to use the term "jurisdiction" instead of country if
>>> we're talking semantic details here. Shouldn't this discussion take place on
>>> a talk page somewhere?
>>
>> Weak agreement on this invocation of the Fear Of Law.  Strong agreement
>> that this discussion should be on a wiki page; see
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:CheckUser_policy
>
> Actually, as it's pointed in several places, that discussion is the
> sole purview of the ArbCom (as long as they don't contradict the
> global checkuser policy), not to the community.
>
>>
>> I am generally loathe to use age as a barrier for anything; we should be
>> clear about where this line is being drawn, and for what reasons.
>>
>> "This is a very important role" is not a reason to discriminate based on
>> age.  "This is a role that requires being responsible" is likewise not
>> appropriate.  "This is a role that requires being legally accountable for
>> one's actions" is...
>>
>> SJ
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>