[Foundation-l] Chart of candidate positions on ads.
Anthere9 at yahoo.com
Tue Jun 26 06:38:02 UTC 2007
It is tough to see comments on something which is no more visible :-(
Brad Patrick wrote:
> I would rather that as well, Erik. I just thought it trivialized what
> is a significant issue. ('it' being a graphic depicting...well, I'm not
> sure what it was depicting.)
> This should be a discursive process, imo.
> Erik Moeller wrote:
>> Don't be so easily discouraged; I thought it was interesting. Hard to
>> quantify positions like that, of course. I'd prefer a table with
>> quotes from the Q&A page.
>> On 6/26/07, Jeandré du Toit <jackdt at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 6/26/07, Brad Patrick <bradp.wmf at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> So now the election process itself has become a parody of USA Today?
>>>> This is absurdity. If you have sufficient concerns about specific
>>>> candidates say so. I would hope people who care enough about the issue
>>>> to be interested in learning people's positions could do so without
>>>> visual aids.
>>> Sorry. I've tagged it for speedy deletion G6.
>>> I asked here because my position on summaries being good was also
>>> rejected at another site: I was burned by those admins for linking to
>>> the opensecrets page for a famous person and the voting history for
>>> the person they contributed to.
>>> User:Jeandré du Toit
>>> foundation-l mailing list
>>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
More information about the foundation-l