[Foundation-l] checkuser

oscar van dillen oscarvandillen at wikimedia.org
Sun Jul 29 23:10:44 UTC 2007


http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:CheckUser_policy#What_is_.22a_wiki_with_a_.28Wikimedia-approved.29_Arbitration_Committee_.28ArbCom.29.22.3F

here is i think a question related to afaik an unclear part of the policy.

best regards,
oscar
-- 
*edito ergo sum*

On 7/29/07, Florence Devouard <Anthere9 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I got several requests about this, so this mail is mostly to get the
> ball rolling. Nothing urgent !
>
> Checkuser ombudsmen have been appointed now a year ago by the board.
> http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Ombudsperson_checkuser
>
> I guess it is time for a renewal and little feedback on this, and more
> generally, on checkusers.
>
> So, please reflect on the following points if appropriate
>
> 1. is there any change to the checkuser policy that you might wish to
> suggest ? If so, please comment here:
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Checkuser (talk page)
>
> 2. are they currently checkusers who still do not comply with the data
> access policy ? Perhaps Cary can give a private feedback on this.
>
> 3. are they inactive checkusers ? If so, according to policy, they
> should be removed. Can someone make a summary of activity, in the same
> way that stewards activity perhaps ?
>
> 4. is there any change to the privacy policy that you might wish to
> suggest ? If so, http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Privacy_policy
> (talk page)
>
> 5. is there any change to suggest about the ombudsmen committee role ?
> Clarifications ? If so, please here:
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ombudsman_committee (talk page).
>
> 6. last year, ombudsmen committee was appointed by the board. Maybe this
> year, we can do it differently, and have the community approve/vote
> people and Foundation "sanctify" the community choice ? If so, how would
> you suggest doing that ? Similar that steward election ? Or is there
> another preferred solution ?
>
> Please take the time to give a feedback on this within the next 2-3
> weeks, so that we can move on end of august on the topic.
>
> Thanks
>
> Ant
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>


More information about the foundation-l mailing list