[Foundation-l] Wikimedia Pennsylvania

Casey Brown cbrown1023 at comcast.net
Tue Jul 10 15:35:00 UTC 2007


The argument for state-level blocks is that laws on these types of
organizations vary from state-to-state and it's easier to be within one
state as opposed to stuck in the middle between a bunch.  At least that's
what ChapComm tells us. :)

Casey Brown
Cbrown1023

-----Original Message-----
From: foundation-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:foundation-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Brion Vibber
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:22 AM
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimedia Pennsylvania

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Casey Brown wrote:
> Just for the record, we are doing State-based chapters at the request of
the
> Chapters Committee.  We had originally wanted a regional committee, but
> ChapComm strongly suggested simply a state organization (and who were we
to
> argue? :P).

Hmm, I'd tend to agree with the sentiment that regional / metro-based
chapters make more sense than state chapters, especially if the idea is
to organize local activity. We already have US legal infrastructure in
WMF, and there'll be more benefit in local organizing by keeping groups,
well, local.

Miami and Tallahassee, or Los Angeles and San Francisco, or Philly and
Pittsburgh, don't seem like super-convenient pairings to me.

What's the argument in favor of state-level blocks?

> Interesting point about the name.  However, the two do indeed overlap, in
> many instances including this one.  Our own article even says that the
> internet TLD .pa is used by Panama *and* Pennsylvania jointly, due to the
> overlap in their names.  I really don't think it is worth changing at this
> moment in time.  After all, there may never be a Wikimedia Panama and it
is
> just an abbreviation, no official meaning is given.

One sensible thing might be to use subdomains under wikimedia.us:
pa.wikimedia.us, il.wikimedia.us, etc? :)

- -- brion vibber (brion @ wikimedia.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGk6QOwRnhpk1wk44RAlKzAJ9mQ7mRqzJjgrK79zqT7Sj5VoMnsQCcCe9w
MepnH+dSZT6zA0BL5u1lq5s=
=mlsc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l




More information about the foundation-l mailing list