[Foundation-l] (no subject)

[Dan Rosenthal]

Absolutely right. That's what her job description as chairwoman is.  
If she were not doing that, she would have been removed from the  
position.

It still does not entitle her to childcare expenses. Those have  
NOTHING to do with her direct function of being on the board. They  
are a secondary expense, one that when she accepted the board  
position, continued to remain her responsibility.

I find it quite disturbing Erik that you call our discussion on the  
travel policy, one that was referred to this list by Florence, who  
has already thanked us for the feed back ("thank you for the  
feedback" in email to Luna Santin), that you call it nonsense.  
Discussion and constructive criticism is not nonsense, and never has  
been. It's that kind of thinking which is why we need more  
responsibility in accounting.

-Dan Rosenthal
On Jul 9, 2007, at 2:47 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:

> Florence has led the organization through difficult times and has
> always put as much time into the role as required, with _no_ personal
> compensation whatsoever.