No subject

he does not answer the question why it would be good for him to stand, there
is no reason to think otherwise.

Thanks,
     GerardM

On 7/7/07, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonavaro at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Not speaking on the behalf of Danny in any shape or form...
>
> There could nevertheless be many reasons why Danny
> could be prevented from speaking his full mind. For instance
> confidentiality agreements he had undertaken as an employee.
>
> I find it amusing that you are asking for a close reading of
> your own message, to avoid over interpretation or whatever,
> when it would behove us all to AGF well and deeply.
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>