[Foundation-l] spamming of the english wikipedia users detected

[Thomas Dalton]

> "Has to be parsed by an grammar lawyer to be read and interpreted
> properly" == "A misstatement"
>
> The information put forwards has to be both literally correct *and*
> interpreted by any casual reader to have the correct information
> content, or it's wrong...

I think there is at least a 50/50 chance of people interpreting it
correctly. It could certainly do with clarifying, though. Just
changing the "and" to "together with" should do it.