[Foundation-l] Restriction on page moves inpt.wikipedia.org

[Titoxd@Wikimedia]

Do you mind providing links to the discussions that took place? That can
help us understand the arguments a bit more, even though I do not think this
is controversial. 

Titoxd.

-----Original Message-----
From: foundation-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:foundation-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Nix
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 4:59 PM
To: foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Foundation-l] Restriction on page moves inpt.wikipedia.org


Thank you for the answers. 

Well, the decision was taken after almost three months of discutions, 
followed by a regular voting poll (the same used to choose official
policies). 

The option that requires a 45-day-old account to move page was clearly the
will of majority.

If the decision is way to restrictive according to the Foundation, 
we'll have to choose the best option available.

Well, that's it. Thank you in advance
Dantadd




************************************************************
In my opinion, but of course i can not speak in any way for the foundation,
this is not an issue that is up to the foundation. The local community knows
best what they need, and I guess that if they find a developer that wants to
implement this, they can just ask him (her) to do it. I see no need to
discuss it all over here :-) It would perhaps be something different if you
prohibit editing for unregistered users etc maybe :-)

Lodewijk

2007/2/18, Titoxd op Wikimedia <titoxd.wikimedia op gmail.com>:
>
> No, it only requires some alterations of the site configuration file.
> Nothing major, actually. The main issue here is if it is acceptable to the
> Foundation.
>
> Titoxd.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: foundation-l-bounces op lists.wikimedia.org
> [mailto:foundation-l-bounces op lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Casey
Brown
> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 2:58 PM
> To: 'Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List'
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Restriction on page moves
> inpt.wikipedia.orgThankyou
>
> Hi Daniel, one question:  Was this conclusion reached from a "straw poll"
> or
> discussion?  Otherwise, it seems good, but it would probably involve a
> site-wide semi-protection against moves and upping the "new account
> cut-off"
> to 45-days.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: foundation-l-bounces op lists.wikimedia.org
> [mailto:foundation-l-bounces op lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Daniel
Nix
> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 4:25 PM
> To: foundation-l op lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: [Foundation-l] Restriction on page moves in
> pt.wikipedia.orgThankyou
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> In a recent poll on pt.wikipedia it was decided to restrict move
> pages to users with at least a 45-day-old registered account, the same
> minimum period to grant right to vote (but without the request of 100
> valid
> editions).
>
> I made a request on http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9024 and
> it was suggested to consult the Foundation because the decision seems to
> be
> very restrictive.
>
> Well, the community decision was:
>
> First question (pro or con):
> *52 pro restriction
> *11 contro restriction
>
> Second (time restriction):
> *15 votes - 5 days
> *8 votes - 15 days
> *38 votes - 45 days
>
> So, I'd like to know what you think about it and what could be done after
> this decision.
>
> Thank you,
> Dantadd
> http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usu%C3%A1rio_Discuss%C3%A3o:Dantadd 

 __________________________________________________
Fale com seus amigos  de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger 
http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/ 
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l