[Foundation-l] About rumors...
Jeff V. Merkey
jmerkey at wolfmountaingroup.com
Mon Feb 12 17:43:35 UTC 2007
Don't feel bad Anthere, it happens to me all the time. Wikipedia has
made a lot of success and
with comes a lot of folks who are jealous of its success. Personally I
would not discuss the
financial details of any venture I have with anyone outside of a board
room or to the main
financial contributors as a matter of policy, but I don't run the board.
I would ignore these trolls -- there's no such thing as bad publicity.
If anything, it may
encourage more people to contribute to the efforts.
Sorry this happened to you. Keep your chin up, boss, we are still here
for you and the Foundation.
>I was away from my computer for 4 days last week, to participate to a
>conference (LIFT) in Switzerland. During this conference, the organiser
>asked me questions about the financial situation of the projects. I
>answered with plain honesty and unfortunately with some words which
>raised the attention of a blogger in the room.
>Never mind that the words were taken out of context, never mind the
>smiles that went with the words, the words were out. Twisted.
>So, if some of you have heard that Wikipedia might close in 4 months due
>to financial difficulties, these are the words I am talking about.
>For more on the discussion on the matter, please see the blog of Mr
>Guissani. I had a long discussion with him on financial matters on
>I think that summarize things pretty well.
>The day the WMF will plan to close Wikipedia for lack of funds, believe
>me, you'll know. Before the press.
>Will Wikipedia close in 4 months ? NO. NO. AND NO.
>TRANSPARENCY AND FIGURES
>All of our financial statements for year 2004, 2005 and 2006 are public
>and audited. Please find them here:
>We also have a page where we state our needs for the coming 6 months.
>(as a reminder, our fiscal year goes from june to june)
>TO make it short, we currently have above 1 million (exact figures to
>pick up from Carolyn, perhaps 1,5) in bank, available for use.
>Current monthly expenses as of today are about 75 000 dollars.
>We had an (optimistic goal) of hardware investment of 1,6 million before
>june. We can expect bandwidth and hosting costs to naturally follow. We
>also need more human help, at least hiring a permanent executive
>director, a CTO and probably more developers.
>Just have a look at the page and do count yourself. If you add current
>daily operations + hardware investment + increase in bandwidth +
>increase in hosting + 3 to 5 additional employees, we are already over
>that 1.5 millions that we have in hand.
>So, as of today, I think we can quietly say that
>"yes, we have about 3-4 months of operations at hand". Not 6 months. Not
>1 year. Not 2 years. Roughly 3-4 months.
>If you look at the bottom of this page,
>you'll see that the recommandations of auditors is always to try to have
>6 months of reserve. We are far from it. We have roughly 4 months.
>Having 6 months of reserve is financially wiser.
>Did you have a way to know this previously ?
>Yes you did. It was listed in the site notice during the full month of
>fundraising. So, there is nothing new to wikipedians. There might be
>something new to press though.
>IS THAT A BIG DEAL ?
>I repeat, we are not going to disappear. We have been in worse state in
>the past. Well, in december 2006, some expenses were delayed, delayed
>till the money from the fundraising was flowing in, and we could pay the
>Someone mentionned image server a few days ago. Image server was planned
>in september hardware quote. But purchase was delayed till december.
>Because given our cashflow situation, it would have been unreasonable to
>buy the image servers.
>This should not happen. We should not come to the point where we delay
>hardware investment. We should aim to provide the best service, not just
>the service we can afford.
>We should not try to pretend we do not need money. We do need more
>money. People at the Foundation are trying to find creative ways to
>collect more, with services (datafeed), royalties from brand use
>(Wikipedia in particular), matching donations etc... but raising the
>money for the projects should not become only the business of 10 or so
>employees. This should be many people concern. Because Wikipedia is not
>the website of a few people, not even the website of the community, it
>is a common good.
>foundation-l mailing list
>foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
More information about the foundation-l