[Foundation-l] Future board elections

[hillgentleman]

Anthere,
 The question is, rather, if you have specific roles for each
of the 11 players you propose to field.

 Are you going to be the goalie?

Best,
H.
On 29/12/2007, Florence Devouard <Anthere9 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I am aware this will make more difficult for all members to meet
> together and should increase costs for meetings. However, it seems to be
> a more reasonable number to welcome both community members and
> outsiders, avoid putting too much constant pressure on volunteers,
> provide more diversity of skills and allow room for resignations...
>
> Ant
>
> Ilario Valdelli wrote:
> > Sure! 11 like a soccer team.
> >
> > Ilario
> >
> > On Dec 28, 2007 2:38 PM, hillgentleman
> > <hillgentleman.wikiversity at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Anthere,
> >>
> >> Is there a rationale behind the number 11?   Is it because 11=10+1 ?
> >> I ask this because, even though in principle, more people should get
> >> more work done, the relationship need not be linear.  And it also
> >> costs more.
> >>
> >> h.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>