[Foundation-l] Foundation Discretion Regarding Personnel Matters
cimonavaro at gmail.com
Sat Dec 15 13:42:56 UTC 2007
On 12/15/07, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 15/12/2007, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonavaro at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 12/14/07, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > While such an agreement may seem like a good idea at the time, I think
> > > the current situation shows why that thinking is flawed. Had the WMF
> > > been open about the whole situation at the time, we wouldn't now be in
> > > the situation of having our credibility ripped to shreds in the
> > > tabloids. It's not a fun thing to do, but generally when something bad
> > > has happened it's best to admit it and face the music, trying to keep
> > > it hidden just results in more trouble in the long run.
> > Our credibility is not ripped to shreds. Tabloids don't have the mojo to
> > accomplish that.
> Do you know how many people read tabloids? It's a very big number.
The Register? A very big number. Yes, their readership, of course. I can
clearly see how these variables and values are connected...
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]]
More information about the foundation-l